女人是男人的未來

9.3 播放:18萬 更新:2026-04-26

七年前,宣花(成賢娥 飾)是憲?。ń鹛┯?飾)的女友。文昊(劉智太 飾)是憲俊的學弟,同時文昊又一直暗戀宣花。不久憲俊到國外留學,宣花與文昊兩人開始約會,但最終也沒能走到一起?! 椏≡谄吣旰髮W成歸國,并成了導演,他找到了在大學教書的文昊聚舊,這時候文昊已成家立室。敘談之間,他們漸漸說起了往日所愛宣花。他們都想再次見到宣花,于是兩人決定一起去尋找宣花。  在一同尋找舊愛的過程中,兩個男人之間又開始有了內心的較量。   

即刻觀影

劇情賞析

七年前,宣花(成賢娥 飾)是憲?。ń鹛┯?飾)的女友。文昊(劉智太 飾)是憲俊的學弟,同時文昊又一直暗戀宣花。不久憲俊到國外留學,宣花與文昊兩人開始約會,但最終也沒能走到一起?! 椏≡谄吣旰髮W成歸國,并成了導演,他找到了在大學教書的文昊聚舊,這時候文昊已成家立室。敘談之間,他們漸漸說起了往日所愛宣花。他們都想再次見到宣花,于是兩人決定一起去尋找宣花。  在一同尋找舊愛的過程中,兩個男人之間又開始有了內心的較量。   

編輯推薦

復仇1978

塞爾玖·尼古拉耶斯庫,J·迪尼克,J·康斯坦丁

  故事發生在1941年,希特勒支持的羅馬尼亞鐵衛軍到處殘害人民,迫害共產黨員,陰謀進行顛覆,取代安東尼斯庫政權,其中鐵衛軍隊長巴拉班尤其嗜殺成性。安東尼斯庫政權保安機關的警長(后升為警察總監)莫多萬在羅馬尼亞共產黨支持下,單槍匹馬深入虎穴和以巴拉班為首的鐵衛軍展開血腥斗殺......

姐妹2026

鄭知曉,李洙赫,車珠英

改編自英國電影《愛麗絲的失蹤》                                                                        為了給弟弟的手術費籌錢,海蘭與身為高利貸主的泰秀聯合策劃了一起綁架案,目標就是海蘭同父異母的姐姐素珍。素珍之前并不知道自己還有個妹妹,當身份關系揭曉,綁匪和人質之間變得微妙起來……

自殺森林

娜塔莉·多默爾,泰勒·金尼,歐文·馬肯,斯蒂芬妮·沃格特,小澤征悅,Rina Takasaki,櫻井北子,Y?ho Yamashita,藤本政志

  生活在美國的莎拉·普斯(娜塔莉·多默爾 Natalie Dormer 飾)近日來心神不寧,她有一個孿生妹妹杰西(娜塔莉?多默爾 Natalie Dormer 飾)在日本擔任外教。然而杰西突然下落不明,莎拉拜托山梨縣警方幫助搜查,最終得到的結果是杰西可能進入了擁有“自殺勝地”之稱的青木原森林自我了斷。莎拉絕不認同警方的推測,她不顧男朋友的阻攔,獨自踏上前往日本的旅途。她最先來到了妹妹任教的學校,在調查未果之后乘上了前往青木原森林的列車。他人的勸阻無法攔住莎拉的腳步,她朝向森林深處走去?! ≡谶@一過程中,恐怖詭異的經歷交替襲來……

突襲2026

楊杏,宮宏佳

  電影主要講述的是緝毒警察在臥底隊員的配合下,里應外合徹底擊敗釘公販毒組織的故事。

阿里

安德拉尼克·馬奈,帕斯卡爾·雷內里克,Théo Delezenne,Ryad Ferrad,伊娃·拉利耶,Lomane de Dietrich,Mikael Don Giancarli,克萊芒絲·庫隆,Fabio Caron,Audrey Bonnet,克萊爾·博德森,蘇菲?卡達尼,Alphonso Scavo,Immanuelle Shékina,Isaure Bony Agoua,Melvil de Waegenaire,Tom Menanteau,Alexandre Auvergne,Serena

  阿里曾是一位年輕的教師,他辭去了工作,卻被父親無情地趕出了家門。在感到迷茫和孤獨之際,他重新找到了舊友,這一舉動觸發了他一段深刻的自我探索之旅。

等待方舟

耶日·斯圖爾,克里斯提娜·楊達,卡里娜·謝魯斯克,馬里烏什·德莫霍夫斯基,馬雷克·瓦爾切夫斯基,揚·諾維茨基,亨里克·比斯塔,萊昂·涅姆奇克,克茲佐夫·馬扎克,斯坦尼斯瓦夫·伊加爾

  Set in an underground dungeon inhabited by bundled, ragged human beings, after the nuclear holocaust. The story follows the wanderings of a hero through the situations of survival. People wait for the Ark to arrive and rescue them while their habitat falls apart.  Delving deep into the dusty and long abandonded vaults of b-cinema in search of lost gems always leaves me with a bittersweet taste. On one hand the discovery of unexpected gems where no one would think them possible is a rewarding experience. On the other hand though it makes one wonder how many of these remarkable low-budget oddities, personal love affairs of directors never quite famous and now all but forgotten, have almost forever slipped from memory?  n any case what we have here is a little post-apocalyptic gem from Poland that is really better than it has any right to. The dystopian near future of O-BI, O-BA finds a group of survivors of the nuclear war that ravaged the Earth inhabiting an underworld concrete bunker and biding their time as they wait for the mysterious Ark, an air ship of some kind that will come and save them. The Ark proves to be an elaborate hoax, carefully designed to give hope to the malnourished and desperate denizens of the bunker, while in the meantime the dome that separates their miserable existence from the nuclear winter outside is slowly caving in.  What first striked me about the movie is the design of the bunker and the depiction of the survivors. The survivors are gaunt, filthy and terrible-looking penitents, dressed in rags and aimlessly wandering the neon-lit halls of the bunker like automatons. The bunker is a rundown, seedy place, with bright neon lights peering from all sides like the eyes of malignant beasts.  On one hand it is a slightly 80's depiction of the dystopian future but the movie never stoops down to MAD MAX cheese. Instead it combines biting political satire with the bleak outlook of a world with no future, black comedy with barbs on apathy, religion and power. The survivors, for example, are fed some kind of flour dropping from a tube that hovers in the air - later on we discover the food supervisor uses books and the Bible itself as filler for this meagre meal. There are many such short symbolic touches, perhaps not life-changing or faith-restoring, yet playful, clever and inspired.  One thing is for sure; O-BI, O-BA is not your run-of-the-mill sci-fi schlock. It overcomes its modest budget with creativity and has genuine artistic aspirations both from a writing and directing perspective. My opinion is that it should have been filmed in black and white instead of colour though. The director uses atmospheric light and shadow to great effect and it would have registered even better in stark black and white. The blue-green neon on the other hand outstays its welcome after a while. Just a minor gripe in an otherwise solid b-movie with its heart set in all the right places.  Imagine a less bleak THE ROAD (Cormac McCarthy) being injected with the satire and humour of DR.STRANGELOVE and you're getting there. See it if you can find it.